Sep 30, 2022·edited Sep 30, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
The gaslighting of women by women experts in this realm is an unbelievable nightmare. If you go read the garbage printed in, e.g., AAAS Science, it's like, "women have had a history of not being heard" and two sentences later, essentially, "people who say these issues [delayed menstruation, 'temporary' infertility, etc.] are problematic and spreading misinformation."
So is it a consequence of profound, systemic medical sexism or is it misinformation?
You can't have it both. You can see why modern 'feminism' is just a window dressing to coerce genuine narratives interested in real human freedom into pro-consumerist agendas.
Thank you for your amazing, detailed & HONEST article. The Light of TRUTH will eventually come to pass. It is doctors like you who are making a difference. GOD bless you & your work ...
I voted no need only because I am 52 and have two children (11 and 12 years old thanks to polycystic ovarian reserve at 40 years old). I WILL recommend this testing for women who are considering or are coerced into getting the shot. Very interesting article.
If even justices of the SCOTUS don't know because they are not biologists then how the hell would Kate Clancy know what a woman is? It appears she has no idea.
Off the bat, if anyone has a rainbow flag, a Ukraine flag and they’re not Ukrainian, or pronouns in their bio, you can know not to trust them. It’s the modern day white stripe skunks display on their backs as a warning. They’re a political operative. Sorry, I expect my doctors to put medicine first, not their political opinions.
Maybe if they spent more time doing research at home instead of watching MSNBC, they’d actually know what’s going on.
On the plus side, you can look up your doctors twitter feed and find out if they’re toxic or not before you make an appointment now a days, so that’s good.
I like how you put the trademark on the pseudoscience identifier... I try to do that too.
I personally prefer to remove the spaces, so it's more obvious that TheScience™ is a single term. Separating "The" and "Science," even if both capitalized, leaves open the potential interpretation that Faucism's attempt to redefine the meaning of science has some validity (which of course it doesn't.)
Co-expression of the SARS-CoV-2 entry molecules ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in human ovaries: Identification of cell types and trends with age. Wu M. et al., 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.08.012.
-
"The ovary is the core of the female reproductive system, and damage to it can cause infertility and premature ovary failure… Our study revealed that approximately 80% of the ovarian cells were positive for ACE2 and TMPRSS2; they are predominantly enriched in oocytes and matrix cells of human ovaries."
During testimony before a Congressional committee yesterday, a "doctor" from PPFA when asked if men can become pregnant answered, "Yes, men can become pregnant, especially trans men."
I wish I could find the video clip.
Are you following reports from Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly on the FOIA'd Pfizer documents (that the FDA wanted hidden for 75 years)? Wolf speaks about the LNPs accumulating in the ovaries as a risk in addition to transfection.
Thank you for writing this, very informative. I never even knew about AMH. I didn't get the vax though and neither did my adult daughters. Both have never caught covid, either. I will tell them to get tested.
Who was that despicable OB/GYN who was running around last year telling us women weren't having menstrual issues post vax and that it was nothing but stress. She's awfully silent now.
The gaslighting of women by women experts in this realm is an unbelievable nightmare. If you go read the garbage printed in, e.g., AAAS Science, it's like, "women have had a history of not being heard" and two sentences later, essentially, "people who say these issues [delayed menstruation, 'temporary' infertility, etc.] are problematic and spreading misinformation."
So is it a consequence of profound, systemic medical sexism or is it misinformation?
You can't have it both. You can see why modern 'feminism' is just a window dressing to coerce genuine narratives interested in real human freedom into pro-consumerist agendas.
I find this poll confusing.
<< Do you plan to get your AMH checked (women only)? >>
Can you please define what woman only means?
</sarc>
Those doctors are either ignorant or malicious and bought off. Probably all three!!!
Thank you for your amazing, detailed & HONEST article. The Light of TRUTH will eventually come to pass. It is doctors like you who are making a difference. GOD bless you & your work ...
I voted no need only because I am 52 and have two children (11 and 12 years old thanks to polycystic ovarian reserve at 40 years old). I WILL recommend this testing for women who are considering or are coerced into getting the shot. Very interesting article.
If even justices of the SCOTUS don't know because they are not biologists then how the hell would Kate Clancy know what a woman is? It appears she has no idea.
"Non-menstruating people". 😐
Who may also identify as armadillos.
Off the bat, if anyone has a rainbow flag, a Ukraine flag and they’re not Ukrainian, or pronouns in their bio, you can know not to trust them. It’s the modern day white stripe skunks display on their backs as a warning. They’re a political operative. Sorry, I expect my doctors to put medicine first, not their political opinions.
Maybe if they spent more time doing research at home instead of watching MSNBC, they’d actually know what’s going on.
On the plus side, you can look up your doctors twitter feed and find out if they’re toxic or not before you make an appointment now a days, so that’s good.
I like how you put the trademark on the pseudoscience identifier... I try to do that too.
I personally prefer to remove the spaces, so it's more obvious that TheScience™ is a single term. Separating "The" and "Science," even if both capitalized, leaves open the potential interpretation that Faucism's attempt to redefine the meaning of science has some validity (which of course it doesn't.)
I noticed Male was very dismissive of Aseem Malhotra's latest articles too.
Bill G and Fauci's fertilities are certainly NOT at risk.....
Co-expression of the SARS-CoV-2 entry molecules ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in human ovaries: Identification of cell types and trends with age. Wu M. et al., 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.08.012.
-
"The ovary is the core of the female reproductive system, and damage to it can cause infertility and premature ovary failure… Our study revealed that approximately 80% of the ovarian cells were positive for ACE2 and TMPRSS2; they are predominantly enriched in oocytes and matrix cells of human ovaries."
During testimony before a Congressional committee yesterday, a "doctor" from PPFA when asked if men can become pregnant answered, "Yes, men can become pregnant, especially trans men."
I wish I could find the video clip.
Are you following reports from Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly on the FOIA'd Pfizer documents (that the FDA wanted hidden for 75 years)? Wolf speaks about the LNPs accumulating in the ovaries as a risk in addition to transfection.
https://dailyclout.io/amy-kelly-what-did-the-hundreds-of-thousands-of-pfizer-documents-from-the-fda-expose/
Do you have any thoughts as to the mechanism of action? How would the jabs cause excessive bleeding?
Thank you for writing this, very informative. I never even knew about AMH. I didn't get the vax though and neither did my adult daughters. Both have never caught covid, either. I will tell them to get tested.
Who was that despicable OB/GYN who was running around last year telling us women weren't having menstrual issues post vax and that it was nothing but stress. She's awfully silent now.
I'm still deciding what my pronouns are, and what to identify as so this is a bit too much for me right now. I do know these people are fucking crazy.