42 Comments
Jul 31, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I guess the next obvious question might be- how do Retraction Watch get their funding?

Expand full comment

Retraction Watch is a fraud.

Expand full comment

They know what they are doing & do not care. That is the reality.

Expand full comment
Jul 31, 2022·edited Jul 31, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

These evil bastards can only see up to their immediate career advancement for running a smokescreen for the establishment. Don't they realize they're contributing to our very doom through recklessly supporting these dangerous products! I think things will only spiral out of control with the introduction of the monkeypox vaccines.

Expand full comment
Jul 31, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I always appreciate the initial reviewers' comments and the discourse before acceptance for publication.

Prof Ya-Fang Mei should release this correspondence, with the referees' names, the editors' names and conflicts, and any supporting documents.

I appreciate that cross-jurisdiction slander and defamation is a difficult and expensive task. I am not hopeful that his final comment is likely.

Expand full comment

I'm honestly impressed they gave Mei right-of-reply in the article. I thought of RW as really little more than another node in the typical pharma-funded "debunking" echo-chamber network which spans everything from the Trusted News Initiative MSM + Big Tech leviathans to the Wikipedia canon lawyers. "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" Uh nobody. The guardians guard themselves and call it "the scientific method."

Expand full comment
Jul 31, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I just posted about another article that has been held in pre-print since 2020, which also has high relevance for tumor biology and the immune system (as well as brain, sperm, placenta):

https://medquotes.substack.com/p/not-new-spike-transferrin-receptor

Expand full comment

Why would it matter whether a publication is "retracted" or not? It is already public, and accessible free of charge. Whoever wants to read it, can freely read it. Whoever is migrating through Kübler-Ross stages, will deny it irrespectively of whether or not it is "retracted"

Expand full comment

One can only wonder how the in silico analysis tlked about P53 and BRCA from 2020 survived until today?

Expand full comment