NSW is the most populated state in Australia comprising some 8m inhabitants, about a third of the population. It is now world famous for its vaccine mandates that were imposed by Brad Hazzard, their health minister who does not have a medical degree yet prescribed (arguably illegally via mandate) a provisionally approved (restricted use) genomic therapy on the population. So, how did that go?
And why don’t more people world wide recognize that governments everywhere are/have been manipulating and disappearing data?? Not to mention changing definitions regularly to suit their needs….as we know—- something larger is afoot….
Jul 8, 2022·edited Jul 8, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
The same tactics are used in New Zealand. All the players are in lockstep. I know they run for cover when the heat goes on. One of my colleagues over here questioned the NZ government uses of per centages to describe hospitalisations. The Government would say things like, "15% of people in hospital with a positive Covid test are unvaccinated, or ineligible, yet they comprise only 3% of the population, so you are 5 times more likely to be hospitalised".
One problem though, a simple check of population data from the government website showed that there were 15% of the population unvaccinated, not 3%. It appears the government were using an innacurate population source. So what happened when my friend pointed this out? Well first of all they stopped comparing per centages and then they stopped quoting per centages at all. Rather, you had to figure them out for yourself. Well, guess what, as of the last week, new hospital admissions for the unvaccinated and ineligible has dropped to just over 9% when you do the sums AND THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SAYING A THING. Yes, they have been caught red handed.
And the biggest cover up is the classification of cause of death. People may not realise, but dying with Covid does not mean dying from Covid. About two-thirds (quoting the Northern regions Manager, here) of hospitalised people who are Covid positive, did not admit to hospital because of Covid. This way they can stack old people dying with Covid in the unvaccinated category. Many of them did not not die of Covid, but rather from underlying conditions, like old age. All it needs is a corrupted doctor to complete a death certificate saying the person died with Covid. Even with that sleight of hand, they cannot hide the rising number of fully jabbed people dying with Covid, which is now close to 90 %. The other 10 % are the unvaccinated, or ineleigible. And of course there is the old trick of creating an "undervaccinated" category, wherein you can add those who have had two doses, but that second dose was 7 days, or less before their testing date and they died within 28 days of testing. In other words, you can die 35 days after the second jab and still be classified as undervaccinated.
Great post, thanks. Proves this kleptocratic ruling force will stop at nothing to skew anything, including statistics, to prove their points. They’re losing now and they know it. What is their next “logical” - if there is a logical for this bunch - move?
I watched a video on Twitter of people bringing their children to get jabbed in NYC. The group outside were trying to stop them by asking the parents "for just five minutes of their time. You can still get this done, but please give me five minutes of your time. Once you do this you cannot undo it". It was heart wrenching because NOBODY would give them five minutes of their time.
Jul 8, 2022·edited Jul 8, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
That mob are most embarrassing. I might drop off next week a hard copy of this in his electoral office in Pittwater Rd Dee Why. Small world. I’ll need sunnies and a mask, should I wear a hoodie?
Nice article explaining the context. NSW data looks particularly ominous. Most of the pro-vaccine activists on Twitter usually go quiet and move on when it’s mentioned. I suppose holding their nose and doubling down is all they’ve got left at this point.
I forward the email of this post of yours to my 140 unrequited Aussie pollies and "experts". Both yahoo and gmail put my mails into permanent quarantine since I received no auto replies. So I sent just the link with my own headline, it went in like Flynn!
How can you fight against these evil governments who are willing to lie and falsify data? It also hurts that the masses refuse to believe it is happening. So depressing.
Jul 9, 2022·edited Jul 9, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Excellent work. I'm confused about the unknown group, though. Who are they likely to be? What is their likely vaxx status? Some of them are surely unvaxxed, are they not?
Thank you for this article. I'm in the process of debating a government troll in New Zealand and "it" pulled out the NSW reports you mention, as proof, from a reliable, international source, that the vaccines were very effective. The person could ba an AI bot because it never really answers my questions, or disputes my data, instead it jumps to other sources. One huge error in their argument is to base their conclusions on case numbers. We'll, given that the vast majority of true anti-vaxxers don't submit a result means they are understated in case data.
They are also a higher proportion of the population than the what is presented in the data.
And why don’t more people world wide recognize that governments everywhere are/have been manipulating and disappearing data?? Not to mention changing definitions regularly to suit their needs….as we know—- something larger is afoot….
The same tactics are used in New Zealand. All the players are in lockstep. I know they run for cover when the heat goes on. One of my colleagues over here questioned the NZ government uses of per centages to describe hospitalisations. The Government would say things like, "15% of people in hospital with a positive Covid test are unvaccinated, or ineligible, yet they comprise only 3% of the population, so you are 5 times more likely to be hospitalised".
One problem though, a simple check of population data from the government website showed that there were 15% of the population unvaccinated, not 3%. It appears the government were using an innacurate population source. So what happened when my friend pointed this out? Well first of all they stopped comparing per centages and then they stopped quoting per centages at all. Rather, you had to figure them out for yourself. Well, guess what, as of the last week, new hospital admissions for the unvaccinated and ineligible has dropped to just over 9% when you do the sums AND THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SAYING A THING. Yes, they have been caught red handed.
And the biggest cover up is the classification of cause of death. People may not realise, but dying with Covid does not mean dying from Covid. About two-thirds (quoting the Northern regions Manager, here) of hospitalised people who are Covid positive, did not admit to hospital because of Covid. This way they can stack old people dying with Covid in the unvaccinated category. Many of them did not not die of Covid, but rather from underlying conditions, like old age. All it needs is a corrupted doctor to complete a death certificate saying the person died with Covid. Even with that sleight of hand, they cannot hide the rising number of fully jabbed people dying with Covid, which is now close to 90 %. The other 10 % are the unvaccinated, or ineleigible. And of course there is the old trick of creating an "undervaccinated" category, wherein you can add those who have had two doses, but that second dose was 7 days, or less before their testing date and they died within 28 days of testing. In other words, you can die 35 days after the second jab and still be classified as undervaccinated.
The mouse army lives on!
https://twitter.com/ichudov/status/1545443660506058755
Great post, thanks. Proves this kleptocratic ruling force will stop at nothing to skew anything, including statistics, to prove their points. They’re losing now and they know it. What is their next “logical” - if there is a logical for this bunch - move?
I watched a video on Twitter of people bringing their children to get jabbed in NYC. The group outside were trying to stop them by asking the parents "for just five minutes of their time. You can still get this done, but please give me five minutes of your time. Once you do this you cannot undo it". It was heart wrenching because NOBODY would give them five minutes of their time.
“Here’s the deal: Unvaccinated individuals are 97 times more likely to die compared to those who are boosted.” President Biden, 5 Feb 2022
The tweet is still up. This data manipulation and lies are a worldwide phenomena.
https://twitter.com/potus/status/1490086336971386880?s=21
That mob are most embarrassing. I might drop off next week a hard copy of this in his electoral office in Pittwater Rd Dee Why. Small world. I’ll need sunnies and a mask, should I wear a hoodie?
Nice article explaining the context. NSW data looks particularly ominous. Most of the pro-vaccine activists on Twitter usually go quiet and move on when it’s mentioned. I suppose holding their nose and doubling down is all they’ve got left at this point.
Dr Ican'tsee,
I forward the email of this post of yours to my 140 unrequited Aussie pollies and "experts". Both yahoo and gmail put my mails into permanent quarantine since I received no auto replies. So I sent just the link with my own headline, it went in like Flynn!
Thanks.
I will send it off to about 140 Aussie pollies and "experts", including Dr Chant.
How can you fight against these evil governments who are willing to lie and falsify data? It also hurts that the masses refuse to believe it is happening. So depressing.
Great article Dr Syed. I've referenced your work in my latest report on NSW hospitalisations. https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/03-of-nsw-covid-hospitalisations
The cover up now in print.
Great post.
Will stupid wake?
Excellent work. I'm confused about the unknown group, though. Who are they likely to be? What is their likely vaxx status? Some of them are surely unvaxxed, are they not?
It's a Holocaust.
Thank you for this article. I'm in the process of debating a government troll in New Zealand and "it" pulled out the NSW reports you mention, as proof, from a reliable, international source, that the vaccines were very effective. The person could ba an AI bot because it never really answers my questions, or disputes my data, instead it jumps to other sources. One huge error in their argument is to base their conclusions on case numbers. We'll, given that the vast majority of true anti-vaxxers don't submit a result means they are understated in case data.
They are also a higher proportion of the population than the what is presented in the data.