A new preprint from NIH and NIAID authors released on the 27th September confirms that spike protein translocates to the nucleus. This was denied by every single COVID vaccine (gene therapy) advocate to date.
More importantly this paper totally vindicates Jiang and Mei who were forced to retract their completely correct paper under political pressure from Eric Freed of the very same NIH, the funders of Moderna Inc. This was exposed in our article "Welcome to Gilead”
The Viruses journal that forced the retraction of the Jiang paper must immediately reinstate that paper and offer an unconditional apology to Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei.
Eric Freed’s involvement in this retraction needs to be formally - and independently - investigated as a matter of urgency.
The FOIA for Freed’s emails on this matter should be just about due to be released. If they were to show collusion or political interference in Eric Freed’s request to retract the Jiang/Mei paper, Dr Freed will be under the spotlight - and the NIH with him.
Academic papers should only be retracted in the case of proven fraud. The whole future of academic science may well rest on the outcome of this investigation.
Interestingly phospholipid mediators, such as phosphatidic acid (PA), play important roles in regulating the nuclear movement of proteins. The Furin cleavage of the s1 and s2 subunits results in phosphorylation of TAU giving rise to highly phosphorylated TAU, an important precursor to fibrils and prion related diseases.
Nuclear translocation yet another feature of an extremely well designed slow kill bioweapon.
It is common sense that these action occur. Anyone with a decent education should and should have known this. Any time I hear these words “evidence based”, I run for the hills. Freed needs to pay and NIH. Reinstatement of the original article must occur. Maybe it’s time to write to the journal of virology demanding this action.
In the authors' summary in the preprint, the researchers state that the nuclear localization signal motif PRRARSV may supersede the importance of the furin cleavage site and act as a novel pathogenic feature of SARS2
.Can some one explain this, please? Does this help explain how the furin cleavage site is merely just an initiating step in cellular entry?
Walter Chesnut WMC Research has a couple of articles explaning the pathways through wich spike increases the risk of prion disease. From what I (ordinary person) understand it has been "proven" as much as it is possible...the nature of how prion disease is "facilitated" "triggered" is such that it is unlikely for any " one thing" to be identified as the culprit for Prions, for now. The very nature of some processes and pathways they use is so complex that when you slightly "nudge" them in certain direction...it makes them perfect (more or less) to cause prion disese, rare cancers...most stuff that takes years to develop. That could also be "blamed" on "natural aging" hence would be imposible to "prove". Thats why any thing that accelerates those processes is considered a "perfect" disquised bioweapon. Although scientists might not be able to "prove" it yet, that doesnt mean it does not cause prion disease or accelarate all other degenerative diseases. (Scientist did not understand much about spliting atoms but they were able to "use" it to make a nuclear bomb). The point just because you cant prove something does not necessarily mean it does not exist. I guess thats why they did use what they used in manufacturing the vaxc & C19. Perfect bioweapon on so many levels?
I actually read the paper and learnt heaps. Thanks for sharing. So not only does the virus occupy the cytoplasm, but the spike gene and its motif the spike protein attach to and enter the nucleus, though in small amounts. The logical extension to this is that vaccine mRNA, which imitates the viral mRNA, can also enter the nucleus.
"... that spike protein translocates to the nucleus ... was denied by every single COVID vaccine (gene therapy) advocate to date." So the pseudovaccine advocates have been perpetrating falsehoods? No surprise there but is it misinformation that these advocates, including Pharma's paid propagandists (aka 'fact checkers'), spread or is it disinformation, or even malinformation?
Dr Ah Kahn Syed you said on Jul 30 (quote below), so this is still valid we are just adding prion related diseases....correct?
"This is how it will work. There will be "normal" cancers diagnosed at a lower rate but with a higher mortality in 2021-2022, because of fear of going to the doctor. At the same time, lymphomas, leukaemias and unusual cancers (that rely on acute suppression of cancer pathways) will spike but in low numbers. Over the next 2-10 years this will drift into an overall rise in the number of cancers of certain types and I suspect it will be gradual. It will not be able to be directly linked to the vaccines because everybody had them. That is why they needed to remove the control group. It will be difficult to prove, just as it took 40 years to sue J&J for ovarian cancer from their otherwise useless baby powder."
"In conclusion, the SARS-CoV-2 S protein has a functional pat7 NLS “PRRARSV”, that results in one out of four S proteins translocating into the nucleus in infected cells. S Protein appears to shuttle S mRNA (possibly the genome) into the nucleus as well. Thus, the NLS of the S protein may contribute to the evasion of the host immune response and is a novel pathogenic feature of SARS-CoV-2."
Am I correct in understanding that the authors are not claiming the vaxx mRNA made it to the nucleus? Can't they distinguish between genomic spike mRNA and vaxx spike mRNA?
What government health meeting happened regarding COVID vaccines where the Jiang paper was put up on slides during that meeting and the coloring from Jiang's images in the paper were altered making there more room to argue that the spike was not in the nucleus?
Reading this, I wonder what the agenda is? Why release this paper and why now? Same with the CDC aluminum to asthma study.
If you read this paper, they even hint that the insert allowing this nuclear transport is possibly lab engineered. They do so by mentioning the origin question when they could simply have ignored and omitted any such discussion. Similarly, they hint at the impact on DNA being possible but not tested here. They could have simply omitted that discussion.
I guess at this point I have become paranoid about covid and vaccine 'science.' Maybe there is some expensive, patented therapeutic that will soon be offered to address this.
Also, is the PRRARSV that they identify as NLS still in recent omicron strains?
https://open.substack.com/pub/arkmedic/p/new-study-vindicates-jiang-and-mei?r=zfbjp&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
The Evil Elites silence the Whistleblowers so they can continue to get rich from their poisonous vaccines.
They make sure they cannot be held accountable for however many injuries & deaths they cause.
They have no morals & they own the law.
How many more people must be injured or killed before they stop???
Interestingly phospholipid mediators, such as phosphatidic acid (PA), play important roles in regulating the nuclear movement of proteins. The Furin cleavage of the s1 and s2 subunits results in phosphorylation of TAU giving rise to highly phosphorylated TAU, an important precursor to fibrils and prion related diseases.
Nuclear translocation yet another feature of an extremely well designed slow kill bioweapon.
It is common sense that these action occur. Anyone with a decent education should and should have known this. Any time I hear these words “evidence based”, I run for the hills. Freed needs to pay and NIH. Reinstatement of the original article must occur. Maybe it’s time to write to the journal of virology demanding this action.
Thank you so much!
In the authors' summary in the preprint, the researchers state that the nuclear localization signal motif PRRARSV may supersede the importance of the furin cleavage site and act as a novel pathogenic feature of SARS2
.Can some one explain this, please? Does this help explain how the furin cleavage site is merely just an initiating step in cellular entry?
THANKS AGAIN!
Walter Chesnut WMC Research has a couple of articles explaning the pathways through wich spike increases the risk of prion disease. From what I (ordinary person) understand it has been "proven" as much as it is possible...the nature of how prion disease is "facilitated" "triggered" is such that it is unlikely for any " one thing" to be identified as the culprit for Prions, for now. The very nature of some processes and pathways they use is so complex that when you slightly "nudge" them in certain direction...it makes them perfect (more or less) to cause prion disese, rare cancers...most stuff that takes years to develop. That could also be "blamed" on "natural aging" hence would be imposible to "prove". Thats why any thing that accelerates those processes is considered a "perfect" disquised bioweapon. Although scientists might not be able to "prove" it yet, that doesnt mean it does not cause prion disease or accelarate all other degenerative diseases. (Scientist did not understand much about spliting atoms but they were able to "use" it to make a nuclear bomb). The point just because you cant prove something does not necessarily mean it does not exist. I guess thats why they did use what they used in manufacturing the vaxc & C19. Perfect bioweapon on so many levels?
[👨👨👧👧👨👨👧👧👨👨👧👧]🪓🔨🔫💉→→💰 [ Large pharmaceutical companies {∋(FDA, CDC, NIH, EMA~)🤝(🩺 🩺 🏥🏥) }🤝{ (theBill.G.F,WEF)🤝(📰,📺,💻,📶,📄 )→😱😱} ]
I actually read the paper and learnt heaps. Thanks for sharing. So not only does the virus occupy the cytoplasm, but the spike gene and its motif the spike protein attach to and enter the nucleus, though in small amounts. The logical extension to this is that vaccine mRNA, which imitates the viral mRNA, can also enter the nucleus.
Interesting!
"... that spike protein translocates to the nucleus ... was denied by every single COVID vaccine (gene therapy) advocate to date." So the pseudovaccine advocates have been perpetrating falsehoods? No surprise there but is it misinformation that these advocates, including Pharma's paid propagandists (aka 'fact checkers'), spread or is it disinformation, or even malinformation?
Keep up the good work! Can't wait to see the outcome of your FOIA requests!
Dr Ah Kahn Syed you said on Jul 30 (quote below), so this is still valid we are just adding prion related diseases....correct?
"This is how it will work. There will be "normal" cancers diagnosed at a lower rate but with a higher mortality in 2021-2022, because of fear of going to the doctor. At the same time, lymphomas, leukaemias and unusual cancers (that rely on acute suppression of cancer pathways) will spike but in low numbers. Over the next 2-10 years this will drift into an overall rise in the number of cancers of certain types and I suspect it will be gradual. It will not be able to be directly linked to the vaccines because everybody had them. That is why they needed to remove the control group. It will be difficult to prove, just as it took 40 years to sue J&J for ovarian cancer from their otherwise useless baby powder."
I never ever believed I would see the day when mainstream scientists become as corrupt and degenerate as politicians and used car salesmen.
Sad times.
The bell tolls for evidence-based medicine. It is truly dead and gone.
Particularly in light of THIS: https://retractionwatch.com/2022/09/28/exclusive-hindawi-and-wiley-to-retract-over-500-papers-linked-to-peer-review-rings/
I know; on all accounts. Shaking my head in bewilderment as I write this.
its disgusting that we are so damn complacent
"In conclusion, the SARS-CoV-2 S protein has a functional pat7 NLS “PRRARSV”, that results in one out of four S proteins translocating into the nucleus in infected cells. S Protein appears to shuttle S mRNA (possibly the genome) into the nucleus as well. Thus, the NLS of the S protein may contribute to the evasion of the host immune response and is a novel pathogenic feature of SARS-CoV-2."
Am I correct in understanding that the authors are not claiming the vaxx mRNA made it to the nucleus? Can't they distinguish between genomic spike mRNA and vaxx spike mRNA?
Here is the peer-reviewed version published in Frontiers in Microbiology. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073789/full#.Y9KP0xCLlko.twitter
Mum fingers not tingly any more?.All good now? I prayed for both of you....hope it helped.🙏❤
What government health meeting happened regarding COVID vaccines where the Jiang paper was put up on slides during that meeting and the coloring from Jiang's images in the paper were altered making there more room to argue that the spike was not in the nucleus?
So that explains why they are seeing mRNA 60 days after the shots…
I’m merely an engineer. I don’t follow this 100%. If you’d allow, I have a few questions.
1- does this mean the virus also translocates the nucleus? And if so, is this a deviation from other viruses?
2- in your opinion, what’s the difference between the virus doing this, versus the vaccine?
Reading this, I wonder what the agenda is? Why release this paper and why now? Same with the CDC aluminum to asthma study.
If you read this paper, they even hint that the insert allowing this nuclear transport is possibly lab engineered. They do so by mentioning the origin question when they could simply have ignored and omitted any such discussion. Similarly, they hint at the impact on DNA being possible but not tested here. They could have simply omitted that discussion.
I guess at this point I have become paranoid about covid and vaccine 'science.' Maybe there is some expensive, patented therapeutic that will soon be offered to address this.
Also, is the PRRARSV that they identify as NLS still in recent omicron strains?