Amongst the deluge of reveals today is a post from Igor that I might have missed if it hadn’t been for the tenacious Josh Guetzkow (🐭) pointing it out. Here is the short substack from Igor that I recommend reading ASAP: The thing is, Igor is 100% right with this. It comes from a
Oct 21, 2022·edited Oct 21, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Thank you for commenting and showing the Viki Male "debunking", I did not know she commented on my post!
It is amazing how the CDC says "no differential signal was found" in Slide 37, when the differential signal was in Slide 33. (and note the induced abortion 50% difference! Worth another substack post really, I purposely did NOT address it --want to pick it up?)
I believe that Lauren is "inexperienced" and did not realize the damning nature of Slide 33. Nobody at the CDC realized it either and released the slide set. But we found it
As FL-based attorney Jeff Childers proposed in his recent article:
“We need a federal law removing vaccine injury liability shields.
If we do that, if we reverse the state and federal protections for vaccine makers, our long national nightmare will be over. It would instantly kill every single mandate. One tiny federal law would do it. “
Let’s do it! How can I help?
Let's get Children’s Health Defense & others like them involved and pull our intelligence, passion, and tools together.
It seems really simple and obvious to me, but if the birth defect rate went up for those who got the injections earlier in pregnancy compared to later (as that last chart shows) isn't that a screaming red safety signal? It clearly indicates that the shot caused birth defects. There's no ambiguity about it even if we ignore background rates. If the rate goes up from earlier receipt of the shot, it was caused by the shot.
I think we will soon see more 'news' articles about covid causing miscarriages and birth defects as they scramble to confuse the issue.
This is a great article, thank you for posting it!
Would you be open to giving me your. thoughts on two articles I wrote at the very start of my substack since I was greatly concern this would turn into a large issue in the future? I didn't go into the actions of the Gates foundation as much as I could have for space considerations and because that was a relatively well known topic.
Thank you for explaining this so clearly. For getting this work out, and for doing this work that our trusted experts should have been presenting to the public all along.
As a layperson, the glaringly obvious things to me have been that women participating in the trials were expressly told to not get pregnant or plan pregnancy, nor to have sex with a vaccinated male. Then there is the massive list of substances that pregnant women are to avoid but an untested and unproven gene therapy is okay? Perhaps I am delusional.
Oct 21, 2022·edited Oct 21, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Thanks. Increased miscarriage rate from the mRNA vaxx is to be expected from medical first principles.
Research I've seen deliberately underweighted the first trimester, with the expected result of under-reporting miscarriages. The real data are relatively under-weighted with first trimester anyway (the first 6 months of vaxxing included women already in second and third trimester - their first trimester was outside the study period).
Given clear, strong, consistent government bias in treating "The Science" as pro-vaxx propaganda, we should probably assume the worst about their claims until safety is proven otherwise.
This looks oddly familiar. Pfizer study did the same and included all trimesters in calculating miscarriage. When this was found the miscarriage rate was 82%.
2 questions. Doesn’t other medical professionals look at this and question it? How/why are so many people knowingly manipulating data to make these things appear safe??
No one has morals/integrity anymore! They are reprehensible!
BREAKING: Igor just blew the lid off the V-safe pregnancy registry
Thank you for commenting and showing the Viki Male "debunking", I did not know she commented on my post!
It is amazing how the CDC says "no differential signal was found" in Slide 37, when the differential signal was in Slide 33. (and note the induced abortion 50% difference! Worth another substack post really, I purposely did NOT address it --want to pick it up?)
I believe that Lauren is "inexperienced" and did not realize the damning nature of Slide 33. Nobody at the CDC realized it either and released the slide set. But we found it
As FL-based attorney Jeff Childers proposed in his recent article:
“We need a federal law removing vaccine injury liability shields.
If we do that, if we reverse the state and federal protections for vaccine makers, our long national nightmare will be over. It would instantly kill every single mandate. One tiny federal law would do it. “
Let’s do it! How can I help?
Let's get Children’s Health Defense & others like them involved and pull our intelligence, passion, and tools together.
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/c-and-c-news-friday-october-21-2022?r=ow9vg&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
It seems really simple and obvious to me, but if the birth defect rate went up for those who got the injections earlier in pregnancy compared to later (as that last chart shows) isn't that a screaming red safety signal? It clearly indicates that the shot caused birth defects. There's no ambiguity about it even if we ignore background rates. If the rate goes up from earlier receipt of the shot, it was caused by the shot.
I think we will soon see more 'news' articles about covid causing miscarriages and birth defects as they scramble to confuse the issue.
You guys are legends! I am proud to be part of this 🐭 army. Some exceptionally smart and good people! Bravo!
This is a great article, thank you for posting it!
Would you be open to giving me your. thoughts on two articles I wrote at the very start of my substack since I was greatly concern this would turn into a large issue in the future? I didn't go into the actions of the Gates foundation as much as I could have for space considerations and because that was a relatively well known topic.
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-history-of-population-control
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-complete-history-of-depopulation
Why does the CDC push the covid vaccines on pregnant women when the FDA has had this in their docs since the rollout?
**
"Available data on Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy."
https://www.fda.gov/media/153713/download
Thank you for explaining this so clearly. For getting this work out, and for doing this work that our trusted experts should have been presenting to the public all along.
That ' Series' is an In Your Face Series!! Disgusting and Disturbing!
As a layperson, the glaringly obvious things to me have been that women participating in the trials were expressly told to not get pregnant or plan pregnancy, nor to have sex with a vaccinated male. Then there is the massive list of substances that pregnant women are to avoid but an untested and unproven gene therapy is okay? Perhaps I am delusional.
Excellent article
Thanks. Increased miscarriage rate from the mRNA vaxx is to be expected from medical first principles.
Research I've seen deliberately underweighted the first trimester, with the expected result of under-reporting miscarriages. The real data are relatively under-weighted with first trimester anyway (the first 6 months of vaxxing included women already in second and third trimester - their first trimester was outside the study period).
Given clear, strong, consistent government bias in treating "The Science" as pro-vaxx propaganda, we should probably assume the worst about their claims until safety is proven otherwise.
Jikky,
Be careful accepting V-safe data as if we know anything about the reporting bias, or even whether or not we're being given real numbers.
cool info. thx. i blog here about covid and australia in particular. https://blog.justgeorgeous.net/
Well, thank Gilead for Pfizer......I mean thank goodness for Pfizer....."imagine if we were vaccinated".....
This looks oddly familiar. Pfizer study did the same and included all trimesters in calculating miscarriage. When this was found the miscarriage rate was 82%.
2 questions. Doesn’t other medical professionals look at this and question it? How/why are so many people knowingly manipulating data to make these things appear safe??
No one has morals/integrity anymore! They are reprehensible!
Is it possible to get the raw data? Do they offer it?