Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Is there any virologist,strong enough ( and old enough not to care about fall out 🤣😂)that could present your brilliant work? Whilst preserving your anonymity?

I am 70+ and trying to educate my peers to what is happening.Most people with mortgages and children can’t go public. What about Project Veritas. Thank you for searching for the truth.

I will have to read this several more time to be able to explain it to someone else.O level biology doesn’t quite cover it.😊

Expand full comment

Thank you for looking these up!

And indeed the Sars-Cov-2 virus can infect T cells via one mechanism and monocytes through the other.

This is the key feature of how repeat infections of the vaxxed (caused by Original Antigenic Sin and vaccine immune suppression), will kill off above mentioned immune cells and will create an analogue of AIDS in the unfortunate victims. These inserts are there for a reason.

Sars-Cov-2 is already "highly pathogenic", no need to wait for it to deattenuate further although it could become even more pathogenic.

I call the result of this "Chronic Covid" (not the same thing as "endemic covid" or "long covid"). Chronic Covid is a covid infection in person who no longer can clear the virus.


Expand full comment
Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

In case anyone reading this is wondering whether the HIV-like function of sars-cov-2 is theoretical or actual, it seems that a paper with the bat lady of Wuhan herself (Shi Zhengli) as an author demonstrates sars-cov-2's HIV-like ability to infect CD4+ T cells is actual.


In that paper, after carefully demonstrating that the SARS-COV-2 infects T-cells and that the entry pathway is not the ACE2 or TMPRSS2 which are the primary pathways identified for sars-cov-2 entry into other cells, they suggest that the mechanism is mediated by LFA-1. You can easily find papers going back over the last 30 years showing HIV entry into T-cells involving LFA-1.

Shi Zhengli and her team did not choose to mention gp120 or HIV in their paper but I think the association would be obvious to virologists. I don't really know what to make of the fact that they published a paper on this. Is it a confession? A belated warning?

Expand full comment

have shared extensively throughout the Australian scientific Community

.. thank you and your crew

brilliant work

Expand full comment

There’s another piece of evidence coming into view, on the legal side. I’ve been reading through the many Congressional statutes and implementing HHS regulations adopted, mostly since 2000, on the bioterrorism front, from the 1983 law that first set up the Public Health Emergency framework under the 1944 Public Health Service Act, through the 2000 Public Health Improvement Act (which expanded HHS Secretary’s powers almost a year before the anthrax attacks) to the 2020 CARES Act and the current HR 34 - Cures Act 2.0.

There are a lot of them.

But a repeated phrase that keeps coming up is the definition of ‘qualified pandemic or epidemic product’ to include both

“i. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic; or to limit the harm such pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause;


ii. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i).”

See, for example, 42 USC 247d-6d(i)(7)(A) [PREP Act of 2005]

Every time I see it, I note in the margins “”poison and antidote.”

If I’m reading the threads on the go-120 sequences correctly, it’s related to this legal framework: the same team of people designed the poison and the antidote, distributed the poison and is preparing now to roll out the antidote, as a expansion of the control,profit, enslave, kill paradigm.

Bioterrorism is legal, so long as it’s governments committing acts of bioterrorism on their own citizens.

Expand full comment
Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

So glad you have continued in this work. I know everyone is focused on SARS-CoV-2. Does it remain clear Sars 1 and MERS arose naturally without lab manipulation?

Expand full comment
Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

That is a piece of work, again! It hurts the head just reading it never mind the amount of work that must have gone into putting that together. Thank you for sharing. Like part 1 will stick it on fakebook for a laugh. It’s another essential part of the counter narrative that we are living a scam, a plan to bring our world down.

Expand full comment
Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Now that's you've started reading the DEFUSE proposal, might you consider reading who the work was assigned to?

Would really help determine who made SARS-CoV 2.

Hint; the section on n-linked glycosylation sites is written by the Ghost of Chapel Hill.

Expand full comment
Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

If l knew what you were talking about here l would be convinced. But as a layman, l was under the impression that not only had the jury returned, but the judge had announced his decision and was half way home with a bunch of lilies for his wife. Is there really some obdurate half wit out there that still believes this sequencing came from bats stirring a dark brew in an equally dark cave in China?

Expand full comment
Jul 18, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Signed up just because i had to say thank you, Arkmedic, for the work you do.

The comment sections on these truly stellar Substack articles is where the real debates are happening - and there are millions of us out here who are grateful for the opportunity to stand on the shoulders of giants and gain real knowledge and insight.

Jessica Rose, Tess Lawrie, Igor Chudov, Steve Kirsch .. but especially yours Doc. Not sure how the substack thing works, posting this here in the vain hope it ‘bumps’ this slightly older article a little, so that others get to see it and don’t miss this amazing discussion, like i did first time round.

Expand full comment

Great research and article but I have some questions:

- I don't quite understand how 3 sequences don't exist in viruses and one nowhere in nature at all if they are HIV-1 inserts?

- The one that doesn't exist anywhere, where does it come from (lab obviously) but how is it designed and created?

- What do the inserts actually do and if you have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, does that mean all the inserts have done something to your body?

- What conclusion can we have for why someone put the inserts in? Could it be work on an HIV or cancer vaccine or is it really a case of bioweapon case closed?


Expand full comment
Apr 10, 2022·edited Apr 10, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Great work! Praying for your safety.

I have a quick question about the QTQTNS sequence (next to the furin cleavage site). Some DRASTIC people suggest this is a deliberately inserted "superantigen." While I was not surprised to also find the QTQTNS sequence in RaTG13 (because I do not believe RaTG13 is natural), I was very surprised to find this in the "pangolin virus." Does this imply that the pangolin virus was also manmade to further reinforce the natural origin narrative?

Expand full comment

I concede, the Pangolin is cute at a distance in the pic

Expand full comment

This morning "Forbidden Knowledge" came out with an article that gives a new slant to the origins of this virus. A Doctor Bing Liu brought snake venom to out attention when all the 'fact checkers' were busy steering us elsewhere. Wouldn't you know it, he is now dead in a suicide pact. It is a pity we are unable to converse with the dead since killing off whistle blowers would have no point. The Chinese Krait and King Cobra venom have identical sequences apparently to what we are seeing. It is suggested that these have been used and not bats. Wrap a synthesised peptide in nano particle hydrogel and add dynabeads for extra stability and there you go! The dynabeads incidentally are composed of magnetic nanoparticles....well well. It might be worth investigating.

Expand full comment

Just viewed "WATCH THE WATER" interesting but I am not educated on snake venom.

Is it possible for you to run Blast on snake venom. Is there a snake venom database that can be used to compare against your previous research? This may be silly but these days everything has become ridiculous. I am not sure who or what to believe anymore. The CDC has lied to us about vaccines for over 20 years.

Expand full comment